I am new to this Forum and appreciate its existence; meditation can be a lonely business if all I have to listen to is myself. I'm gobbling up the posts here. Lots of information, a lot of questions answered and a lot more posed I haven't thought of. But I haven't been able to read them all, so I apologize in advance if I am repeating prior posts.
I wonder about two approaches to practice, i.e., "let whatever happens be OK" and/or using formal meditation practice during Holosync sessions. For the first year of Holosync I just tried to last out the hour, challenge enough for my hyperactive brain. I think I hoped with Holosync I would end up with the same overall awareness as I did when I practiced formal meditation, peacefully ensconced in the present (no matter how unpeaceful the present might have been). This hasn't happened, at least not yet. While I understand that letting whatever happens be OK refers to the intense emotional challenges to who we think we are that come up, I also got the impression that it means I don't have to make any special effort myself, that the technology takes the effort out of my hands (or mind).
I came to Centerpointe with a history of meditation practice. At its peak, 25 years ago, I was practicing Vipassana (Insight) meditation three or four hours a day and going on occasional silent retreats. Those were the days I had time to do it all. The formal practice was following my breath as a primary focus and staying with wherever my mind wandered when it wandered as a secondary focus. The result was profound and simple. I still remember many incidents, all so mundane in their content, as if they were yesterday. While it all took a lot of time to do, it didn't matter because after a point it became all I wanted to do.
As an aside, the Insight Meditation practice has given me other benefits. It's Buddhism, a psychology, a systematic process of studying oneself, and an ethic to live by, a way of being in the world. While the precepts are difficult to live by (e.g., Tibetan monks, tortured for years by the Chinese, who felt no animosity whatsoever toward their torturers), practicing them could make me feel good about the way I treat myself and others. It seems to me this "spiritual" aspect of Buddhism dove tales well with the idea Bill Harris and Genpo Roshi present that what distracts us from this present moment is our shadow selves. Thus, the more I practice living in a way that is acceptable to me the less distracting shadow material is generated.
My question is this: Is it that if I listen to Holosync long enough I will end up in the same place as those cloistered monks, i.e., grounded in the present, whether my mind wanders or not, no matter what I do or don't do, as long as I don't resist whatever happens? Or do I get more out of my hour by practicing being aware of what's going on as it goes on? (Or is all this a monumental exercise in distraction, failing to see the forest through the trees, the awareness through the thought?)
Tags:
Share
-
▶ Reply to This